NICHCY Logo
National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities
   Home > Research > Current Issues In Research and Practice >
   A Collective Effort -- Weighing in on the Evidence Base
   Home
   What's New
   Search for Info
   Research
   A-Z Topics
   En Español
   Our Publications
   State Resources
   IDEA
   FAQs
   About Us
   Zigawhat!

  Contact NICHCY

  P.O. Box 1492
  Washington, DC 20013
  (800) 695-0285 - v/tty
  (202) 884-8441 - fax
  
nichcy@aed.org











A Collective Effort -- Weighing In on the Evidence Base in Education

Email to a friend icon Email this article
Printer Friendly version icon Printer-friendly version
Table of Contents
  • NICHCY Research Center
  • Best Evidence Encyclopedia
  • Campbell Collaboration
  • Florida Center for Reading Research
  • IDEA Partnership's Results for Kids Library
  • National Institute for Literacy: A Partnership for Reading
  • Promising Practice Network
  • SAMHSA National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices
  • What Works Clearinghouse
  • Wing Institute
  • Common to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) is the call for education professionals to implement academic and behavioral interventions based in quality scientific research. Problem is, there have not been too many places educators, families, or policy makers could turn to locate this research base, let alone ensure that it found its way into practice. A number of organizations have recognized and responded to this need from within the education community -- their efforts are summarized below along with links to their respective web sites...

    NICHCY Research Center

    (Psst.. that's where you are now!)
    NICHCY's Research Center offers a range of materials to connect people with easy to understand educational research:

    • Screenshot NICHCY researchNICHCY Research-to-Practice Database provides a growing number of structured abstracts that condense technical research reports and articles into short accessible briefs. Even better, within each abstract are "Research Connections" to real world examples of practice based on the research.
    • Current Issues in Research and Practice highlights articles from a variety of organizations and news sources that impact the fields of education research and special education.
    • Research Basics provides just that, the basics on why research is important and how to make sense of it.
    • Research News provides some of the latest headlines in the worlds of disability and education research.

    horizontal dotted line for display purposes

    screenshot Best Evidence EncyclopediaBest Evidence Encyclopedia

    The Best Evidence Encyclopedia is brought to you by the Center for Data-Driven Reform in Education, at Johns Hopkins University and provides information on educational programs that have been validated in research. The web site presents high-quality evaluation of programs and includes:

    • Brief, readable "educator summaries" of research on educational programs using symbols like those used by Consumer Reports.
    • Full-text reviews on each topic.

    horizontal dotted line for display purposes

    Screenshot Campbell CollaborationCampbell Collaboration

    The international Campbell Collaboration (C2) is a non-profit organization that aims to help people make well-informed decisions about the effects of interventions in the social, behavioral and educational arenas. C2's objectives are to prepare, maintain and disseminate systematic reviews of studies of social interventions, and to make their findings accessible to decision makers and the general public.

    horizontal dotted line for display purposes

    Screenshot Florida Reading Research CenterFlorida Center for Reading Research

    The Florida Center for Reading Research (FCRR) reports are intended to be a source of information about programs that will help teachers, principals, and district personnel in their choice of materials that can be used by skilled teachers to provide effective instruction. In addition to describing programs and their use, these reports provide information on the extent to which their content, organization, and instructional strategies are consistent with scientifically based research in reading.

    horizontal dotted line for display purposes

    Screenshot IDEA PartnershipIDEA Partnership's Results for Kids Library

    IDEA Partnership's Results for Kids Library responds to several challenges and opportunities inherent in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA 2004) and the No Child Left Behind Act:

    (a) early intervening to prevent learning difficulties from leading to academic failure;
    (b) response to intervention to determine progress and adjust instruction;
    (c) the need for instruction that works for culturally and/or linguistically diverse students;
    (d) the imperative to reduce referrals of children who do not need special education;
    (e) the impetus to increase success for all students in the general curriculum;
    (f) the contribution of non-academic services to improving academic performance; and
    (g) "Raising Achievement: A New Path for No Child Left Behind,” a 2005 initiative of the U.S. Department of Education.

    horizontal dotted line for display purposes

    Screenshot National Institute for LiteracyNational Insitute for Literacy: A Partnership for Reading

    National Institute for Literacy: Partnership for Reading - A major initiative to identify quality reading instruction research began with the work of the National Reading Panel between 1997 and 2000. The Panel, established by Congress, examined the available research and identified 460 studies that met its criteria for research quality. This database contains abstracts of these studies and will continue to add more abstracts on a regular basis as new studies into reading instruction are conducted and reviewed. The database is organized into seven categories related to the teaching of reading

    horizontal dotted line for display purposes

    Screenshot Promising Practices NetworkPromising Practice Network

    The Promising Practices Network (PPN) is dedicated to providing quality evidence-based information about what works to improve the lives of children, youth, and families. The PPN site features summaries of programs and practices that are proven to improve outcomes for children. All of the information on the site has been carefully screened for scientific rigor, relevance, and clarity.

    horizontal dotted line for display purposes

    Screenshot SAMHSASAMHSA National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices

    The SAMHSA National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP) is a searchable database of interventions for the prevention and treatment of mental and substance use disorders. SAMHSA has developed this resource to help people, agencies, and organizations implement programs and practices in their communities.

    horizontal dotted line for display purposes

     

    Screenshot What Works ClearinghouseWhat Works Clearinghouse

    The What Works Clearinghouse was established in 2002 by the U.S. Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences to provide educators, policymakers, researchers, and the public with a central and trusted source of scientific evidence of what works in education.The WWC aims to promote informed education decision making through a set of easily accessible databases and user-friendly reports that provide education consumers with high-quality reviews of the effectiveness of replicable educational interventions (programs, products, practices, and policies) that intend to improve student outcomes.

    horizontal dotted line for display purposes

    screenshot Wing InstituteThe Wing Institute

    The Wing Institute, an independent, non-profit organization, promotes evidence-based education policies and practices by facilitating::

    • Efficacy research (what works?) establishing promising interventions through rigorous, high quality research
    • Effectiveness research (when does it work?)
      identifying through research the minimum conditions for interventions to be successful (student characteristics, setting features, resource demands, social contingencies)
    • Implementation (how do we make it work?) addressing all relevant variables so an intervention will be successfully adopted in a particular setting
    • Monitoring (is it working?) establishing the effectiveness of interventions through on-going evaluation
     
    NICHCY Instant Feedback
    Please take a second to let us know how we're doing:
    (If you are looking for answers to a specific questions feel free to email us: nichcy@aed.org)

    I am a (check all that apply):
      K-12 General EducationTeacher
      K-12 Special EducationTeacher
      School Librarian
      K-12 Student
      Parent/Family
      School Administrator - Job Title:  
      Related Service Provider - Job Title:  
      Para-professional/Specialist - Job Title:  
      Early Childhood Professional - Job Title:  
      Undergraduate/Graduate Student
      College/University Professor - Department:  
      Researcher
      TA Provider
      Policy Maker
     Other - Please specify:  

      Extremely
    Useful
    Very
    Useful
    Useful Somewhat
    Useful
    Not Very
    Useful
    The material presented here is

    Additional Feedback:


    NICHCY Research pages are published in response to questions from individuals and organizations that contact us. We encourage you to share your ideas and feedback with us!
    Project Director: Suzanne Ripley
    Editor: Lisa Küpper, Director of Publications
    Research Director: Stephen Luke

    NICHCY thanks our Project Officer, Dr. Judy Shanley, at the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP), U.S. Department of Education.

    Publication of this Web resource page is made possible through Cooperative Agreement #H326N030003 between the Academy for Educational Development and the Office of Special Education Programs of the U.S. Department of Education. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Education, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

     
    footer with logos for IDEA - Ideas the work, AED - Academy for Educational Development and for Brouse Aloud