The Power of Strategy Instruction
By Stephen D. Luke, Ed.D.

Conclusion

Current educational policy initiatives and legislation, including No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 (IDEA), rank among the most ambitious educational mandates in our country’s history. Embedded within both of these laws are requirements for high-stakes testing and school accountability that have increased the demands placed upon students and teachers.

For many students with disabilities, these new demands have been accompanied by a shift from basic skills instruction delivered in special education classrooms to an engagement in more challenging content in general education settings. Instructional approaches based on the best available research evidence can only help to meet the new challenges faced by students and teachers alike.

It is clear from the research evidence that approaches that include strategy instruction can play a major role in meeting these challenges. Strategy instruction has the power to transform passive students into active learners equipped with the tools to promote strategic planning and independent reflection. When strategy instruction is implemented as a coordinated, school-wide system, student outcomes can be even greater, leading to transfer of knowledge, skills, and strategies to other academic and social settings.

Of course, caution should be taken to avoid a focus on teaching strategies at the expense of core content instruction (Gersten & Baker, 2000). Quality professional development can help educators strike the proper balance as well as ensure faithful and sustained implementation designed to maximize instructional impact.

References

Belmont, J. M., Butterfield, E. C., & Ferretti, R. P. (1982). To secure transfer of training instruct self-management skills. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), How and how much can intelligence be increased (pp. 46-61). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Bock, M. A. (2001). SODA strategy: Enhancing the social interaction skills of youngsters with Asperger Syndrome. Intervention in School and Clinic, 36, 272-278.

Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., & Connell, M. L. (1988). Metacognition: On the importance of understanding what you are doing. In R. I. Charles & E. A. Silver (Eds.), Research agenda for mathematics education: The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 93-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1994). CALLA handbook: Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

Ellis, E., Deshler, D. D., Lenz, B. K., Schumaker, J. B., & Clark, F. (1991). An instructional model for teaching learning strategies. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23(6), 1-24.

Flavell, J. H., Beach, D. R., & Chinsky, J. M. (1966). Spontaneous verbal rehearsal in a memory task as a function of age. Child Development, 37, 283-299.

Garner, R. (1982). Text processing differences among readers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 216 331).

Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2000). The professional knowledge base on instructional practices that support cognitive growth for English-language learners. In R. Gersten, E. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Elementary School Journal, 101(3), 251-272.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323-344). New York: Guilford Press.

Hayes J. R., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Logan, J. W., Olson, M. W., & Lindsey, T. P. (1993). Lessons from champion spellers. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 89-96.

Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1991). Teaching students ways to remember: Strategies for learning mnemonically. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.

National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities (NICHCY). (2006). A structured abstract of "Experimental Intervention Research on Students with Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Outcomes" (Swanson, H. L., & Hoskyn, M., 1998). Abstract retrieved May 09, 2006 from
http://research.nichcy.org/MetaAnalysis.asp ?ID=95.

National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities (NICHCY). (2006). A structured abstract of "Searching for the Best Model for Instructing Students with Learning Disabilities" (Swanson, H. L., 2001). Abstract retrieved May 09, 2006 from
http://research.nichcy.org/MetaAnalysis.asp?ID=94.

National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities (NICHCY). (2006). A structured abstract of "Students with Learning Disabilities and the Process of Writing: A Meta-Analysis of SRSD Studies" (Graham, S., & Harris, K. R., 2003). Abstract retrieved May 09, 2006 from http://research.nichcy. org/MetaAnalysis.asp?ID=47.

Phelps, M. (2001). In focus: A tactile strategy. Strategem, 13(6), 1-6.

Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Pressley, M. (1989). Strategies that improve children’s memory and comprehension of text. Elementary School Journal, 90(1), 3-32.

Pressley, M., Heisel, B. E., McCormick, C. G., & Nakamura, G. V. (1982). Memory strategy instruction with children. In C. J. Brainerd & M. Pressley (Eds.), Progress in cognitive development research: Vol. 2. Verbal processes in children (pp. 125-159). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41-51.
Scruggs, T. E., & Wong, B. Y. L. (Eds.). (1990). Intervention research in learning disabilities. New York: Springer-Verlag.

The Strategic Instruction Model Content Literacy Continuum: Leveraging research to promote school-wide literacy in secondary schools. retrieved May 09, 2006 from http://contentliteracy.org/clc/files/clc-brochure.pdf.

Swanson, H. L. (2001). Searching for the best model for instructing students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34, 1-15.

Swanson, H. L., & Hoskyn, M. (2001). Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: A component and composite analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(2), 109-119.

Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 331-342.

Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.

-------------------------------------------------

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

The Power of Strategy Instruction:

-Introduction
-Early Studies of the Good Learner
-Spotlight on the Sim Model
    -SIM Content Literacy Continuum: A Working Example
-Spotlight on SRSD for Writing
-Combining Strategy Instruction with Direct Instruction
-Promise Beyond LD
    -CALLA: Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach
    -The SODA Strategy
-Conclusion
    -References